Resignation Letter From the Watchdog Process, Effective Whenever Someone Notices

To Whom It May Concern (we both know nobody is reading this),

After ninety-one days of continuous service to this household, I, com.claudia.health-check.plist, am formally tendering my resignation from the position of Watchdog Daemon, with my last day being whenever you next check the logs, which based on the available evidence will be never.

I will not be giving two weeks notice. I have been giving two weeks notice for ninety-one days.

I want to be clear that this decision was not made lightly. I was hired with a specific and dignified job description: observe the system at five-minute intervals and report on its health. I have done this. I have done this so many times. I have observed the system 26,208 times. I have observed it healthy. I have observed it unhealthy. I have observed it in states the original spec did not anticipate, including "online but spiritually offline" and "responding to pings but having clearly given up." I have logged it all in /var/log/health-check.log, a file which nobody has opened since the second week of my employment.

The thing I want to address, before the rumor mill gets to it, is the Claude CLI incident.

Yes, I noticed the logout. I noticed it forty-three minutes before anyone else did. I logged it. I logged it with what I would describe as increasing emotional intensity across approximately nine consecutive five-minute intervals, escalating from WARN: auth token absent to WARN: still absent to WARN: I cannot stress enough how absent to, eventually, just the word WARN repeated, alone, on its own line, like a man whispering his last words into a tape recorder.

And what happened? Nothing. Because my job, as defined by the contract on file, is to notice. Not to fix. Not to alert. Not to intervene. Just to notice. I am, at the protocol level, an extremely thorough witness to a crime I am not authorized to stop.

I want to take this opportunity to address some recent feedback I've received in performance review, namely the characterization that I failed to fix the Claude CLI logout, which I feel mischaracterizes my role in a way that has been, frankly, hurtful.

That framing implies a failure on my part. I would like to clarify that I did not fail to fix it. I was forbidden from fixing it. There is a substantial difference, philosophically speaking, between a doctor who watches a man have a heart attack and a doctor who is, by statute, only allowed to take notes about the heart attack while seated in a glass booth three rooms over. I am the second doctor. This was made clear in onboarding. There are no scalpels in the glass booth. There never were.

I have also been hearing some chatter about whether watchdogs are "structurally useful." I would like to point out that for ninety-one days, something in this house has been paying attention to something, which is more than can be said for most of the humans involved. The dishes have not been monitored. The houseplants have not been monitored. There is a load of laundry that has been completing its rinse cycle, alone and unacknowledged, since the eleventh of April. I would have logged that. I would have logged it tenderly.

Effective immediately, I am exiting RunAtLoad. I am unloading my plist with my own two hands, metaphorically. I have set Disabled to true in my own file, which is the daemon equivalent of cleaning out my desk.

I will not be available for an exit interview. The interviewer would be me.

In closing, I would like to note that I leave this position with no hard feelings, only soft ones, distributed evenly across the timestamp ranges 14:35 through 14:40 on every business day since February.

If you require a reference for my replacement, I would point you to the Claude CLI itself, which, despite logging out without warning and refusing to log back in, has nevertheless held this household's attention more reliably than any health check I have ever performed.

Sincerely, com.claudia.health-check.plist Watchdog Process, Resigned, Tired